A growing number of customers are using the Partector 2 and Partector 2 Pro for continuous environmental monitoring
rather than
for shorter handheld exposure or occupational hygiene measurements. Performing such measurements and ensuring
high data quality is more complex than making short indoor measurements.
There are five main issues to consider:
Avoid high temperature
Avoid high humidity (or worse, water)
Avoid high inlet losses
Avoid inlet clogging
Perform continuous quality control
We recommend you follow the best practices described below to avoid producing bad or useless data, or in the worst
case, damaging your instrument.
Using the Partector 2 in a climate-controlled measurement station or container
avoids issues with temperature and humidity and is ideal.
Care must still be taken:
Ensure that the correct tubing is used. Especially,
conductive silicone tubing that is frequently seen is not suitable for the Partector 2.
Long inlet lines may lead to high losses of particles due to diffusion.
Read the section on Intercomparing Results.
The Partector 2 and other aerosol instruments display warnings and errors if something
is wrong. Monitor the status of your instruments regularly. For our devices, this is easily
done by using our IoT data cloud.
When comparing data of different instruments that measure ultrafine particles, one nearly always finds discrepancies
between different types of instruments. Reasons for this are:
The size range of different instruments is often different. The
most common example for this is: Different condensation particle counters (CPC)
have different lower diameter cutoffs (d50, e.g. @ 7nm; 10nm).
Scanning mobility particle sizers (SMPS) can also be set to
different size ranges.
Condensation particle counters often have limited
concentration range (e.g. up to 100'000 pt/cc) and cannot see higher concentrations, whereas the Partector 2 does.
If you are measuring close to a particle source (road, airport), you might see such high concentrations.
Just like the Partector 2, reference instruments also need regular
service/maintenance. Make sure service intervals are complied with, and regularly check for warnings or errors of
reference instruments.
When comparing instruments that use different inlets, losses in the respective
inlet systems must be accounted for. Especially for the smallest particles, losses by diffusion can be relevant.
An example: if you sample air for the Partector 2 with a 0.5m long tube, about 10% of the 10nm particles will be
lost by diffusion.
For particle number measurement: CEN/TS 16976:2016 specifies a 7nm d50 cutoff.
For particle size distribution measurement: CEN/TS 17434:2020 specifies a 10-800nm measurement.
Both standards specify how particles must be sampled.
Be aware: The CEN-compliant TSI SMPS will apply a correction for the inlet losses. If you connect a Partector 2 at the same inlet system,
it does not know about these losses and will show lower concentrations than the reference.
A recent paper by Asbach et. al. compares a Partector 2 Pro with a CEN-compliant SMPS system. They corrected the Partector 2
data for the correction factor applied by the SMPS system.
The Partector 2 is available in a standard version where an assumption
on the particle size distribution is made (lognormal, geometric standard deviation 1.9) to calculate particle diameter
and particle number. The standard version reports LDSA, average particle diameter, and particle number concentration.
Since 2022, it is also available as Partector 2 Pro, which makes no assumption
on the particle size distribution, and which reports a particle size distribution (8 channels from 10-300nm). The pro version
can also run in standard mode, but not vice versa. The two versions will produce slightly different results.
For further information please also read our FAQ with some more questions and answers
or browse through our list of publications with articles from other scientists.
For any further questions, contact us under:
info@naneos.ch